However, even taking all of these factors into consideration, the limits in a real microscope system are still somewhat limited due to the complexity of the whole system, transmission characteristics of glass at wavelengths below nm and the achievement of a high NA in the complete microscope.
Lateral resolution in an ideal light microscope is limited to around nm, whereas axial resolution is around nm for examples of resolution limits, please see below. During his lifetime, he wrote an astonishing publications including scientific papers. He wrote on a huge range of topics as diverse as bird flight, psychical research, acoustics and in , he discovered argon for which he was later awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in The Rayleigh Criterion Figure 2 defines the limit of resolution in a diffraction-limited system, in other words, when two points of light are distinguishable or resolved from each other.
Taking all of the above theories into consideration, it is clear that there are a number of factors to consider when calculating the theoretical limits of resolution. Resolution is also dependent on the nature of the sample. The sine of half of this angle is 0. If using an immersion objective with oil which has a refractive index of 1. If using a green light of nm and an oil immersion objective with an NA of 1.
Again, if we assume a wavelength of nm to observe a specimen with an objective of NA value of 1. NAobj is the NA of the objective. NAcond is the NA of the condenser. These are used for calculating problems in systems such as wave propagation. Taking the NA of the condenser into consideration, air with a refractive index of 1.
If using a green light of nm, an oil immersion objective with an NA of 1. As stated above, the shorter the wavelength of light used to image a specimen, then the more detail will be resolved. Due to the wave nature of light and the diffraction associated with these phenomena, the resolution of a microscope objective is determined by the angle of light waves that are able to enter the front lens and the instrument is therefore said to be diffraction limited.
This limit is purely theoretical, but even a theoretically ideal objective without any imaging errors has a finite resolution. Observers will miss fine nuances in the image if the objective projects details onto the intermediate image plane that are smaller than the resolving power of the human eye a situation that is typical at low magnifications and high numerical apertures.
The phenomenon of empty magnification will occur if an image is enlarged beyond the physical resolving power of the images. For these reasons, the useful magnification to the observer should be optimally above times the numerical aperture of the objective, but not higher than 1, times the numerical aperture. One way of increasing the optical resolving power of the microscope is to use immersion liquids between the front lens of the objective and the cover slip. Most objectives in the magnification range between 60x and x and higher are designed for use with immersion oil.
All reflections on the path from the object to the objective are eliminated in this way. If this trick were not used, reflection would always cause a loss of light in the cover slip or on the front lens in the case of large angles Figure 2.
The useful numerical aperture of the objective and therefore the resolving power would be reduced by the reflection described above. The numerical aperture of an objective is also dependent, to a certain degree, upon the amount of correction for optical aberration. Highly corrected objectives tend to have much larger numerical apertures for the respective magnification as illustrated in Table 1. When light from the various points of a specimen passes through the objective and is reconstituted as an image, the various points of the specimen appear in the image as small patterns not points known as Airy patterns.
This phenomenon is caused by diffraction or scattering of the light as it passes through the minute parts and spaces in the specimen and the circular rear aperture of the objective. The limit up to which two small objects are still seen as separate entities is used as a measure of the resolving power of a microscope. The distance where this limit is reached is known as the effective resolution of the microscope and is denoted as d 0.
The resolution is a value that can be derived theoretically given the optical parameters of the instrument and the average wavelength of illumination. It is important, first of all, to know that the objective and tube lens do not image a point in the object for example, a minute hole in a metal foil as a bright disk with sharply defined edges, but as a slightly blurred spot surrounded by diffraction rings, called Airy disks see Figure 3 a.
Three-dimensional representations of the diffraction pattern near the intermediate image plane are known as the point-spread function Figure 3 b.
An Airy disk is the region enclosed by the first minimum of the airy pattern and contains approximately 84 percent of the luminous energy, as depicted in Figure 3 c. The point-spread function is a three-dimensional representation of the Airy disk. Objectives commonly used in microscopy have a numerical aperture that is less than 1.
Therefore, the theoretical resolution limit at the shortest practical wavelength approximately nanometers is around nanometers in the lateral dimension and approaching nanometers in the axial dimension when using an objective having a numerical aperture of 1. Thus, structures that lie closer than this distance cannot be resolved in the lateral plane using a microscope.
Due to the central significance of the interrelationship between the refractive index of the imaging medium and the angular aperture of the objective, Abbe introduced the concept of numerical aperture during the course of explaining microscope resolution. The diffraction rings in the Airy disk are caused by the limiting function of the objective aperture such that the objective acts as a hole, behind which diffraction rings are found.
The higher the aperture of the objective and of the condenser, the smaller d 0 will be. Thus, the higher the numerical aperture of the total system, the better the resolution. One of the several equations related to the original Abbe formula that have been derived to express the relationship between numerical aperture, wavelength, and resolution is:.
The factor 1. If the two image points are far away from each other, they are easy to recognize as separate objects. However, when the distance between the Airy disks is increasingly reduced, a limit point is reached when the principal maximum of the second Airy disk coincides with the first minimum of the first Airy disk.
In some instances, such as confocal and fluorescence microscopy, the resolution may actually exceed the limits placed by any one of these three equations. Other factors, such as low specimen contrast and improper illumination may serve to lower resolution and, more often than not, the real-world maximum value of r about 0. The following table Table 1 provides a list resolution r and numerical aperture NA values by objective magnification and correction.
When the microscope is in perfect alignment and has the objectives appropriately matched with the substage condenser, then we can substitute the numerical aperture of the objective into equations 1 and 2 , with the added result that equation 3 reduces to equation 2. An important fact to note is that magnification does not appear as a factor in any of these equations, because only numerical aperture and wavelength of the illuminating light determine specimen resolution.
As we have mentioned and can be seen in the equations the wavelength of light is an important factor in the resolution of a microscope.
Shorter wavelengths yield higher resolution lower values for r and visa versa. The greatest resolving power in optical microscopy is realized with near-ultraviolet light, the shortest effective imaging wavelength. Near-ultraviolet light is followed by blue, then green, and finally red light in the ability to resolve specimen detail. Under most circumstances, microscopists use white light generated by a tungsten-halogen bulb to illuminate the specimen. The visible light spectrum is centered at about nanometers, the dominant wavelength for green light our eyes are most sensitive to green light.
It is this wavelength that was used to calculate resolution values in the Table 1. The numerical aperture value is also important in these equations and higher numerical apertures will also produce higher resolution. The effect of the wavelength of light on resolution, at a fixed numerical aperture 0.
0コメント