Why is electronegativity a factor that influences NMR spectra? What is shielding and deshielding in NMR? Can you give me an example? How is it called the effect of electronegative atoms on their neighbours? What is the pi -bond effect? What happens if the electron density around a nucleus is decreased?
How does electronegativity vary in a group and in a period? What is the least electronegative element? What increases across the periodic table? How does the atomic radius change as you go from left to right in a period? Does atomic radius increases across Period 3? Which element in period 3 has the largest covalent atomic radius?
What is the most metallic element in period 2? Which is the most metallic element Why? Which element in period 3 is most metallic in nature? Previous Article The Love of the art is not innate. Consider sodium at the beginning of period 3 and chlorine at the end ignoring the noble gas, argon. Think of sodium chloride as if it were covalently bonded. Both sodium and chlorine have their bonding electrons in the 3-level.
The electron pair is screened from both nuclei by the 1s, 2s and 2p electrons, but the chlorine nucleus has 6 more protons in it. It is no wonder the electron pair gets dragged so far towards the chlorine that ions are formed. Electronegativity increases across a period because the number of charges on the nucleus increases.
That attracts the bonding pair of electrons more strongly. As you go down a group, electronegativity decreases because the bonding pair of electrons is increasingly distant from the attraction of the nucleus.
Consider the hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride molecules:. The bonding pair is shielded from the fluorine's nucleus only by the 1s 2 electrons. In the chlorine case it is shielded by all the 1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 electrons.
But fluorine has the bonding pair in the 2-level rather than the 3-level as it is in chlorine. If it is closer to the nucleus, the attraction is greater. At the beginning of periods 2 and 3 of the Periodic Table, there are several cases where an element at the top of one group has some similarities with an element in the next group.
Three examples are shown in the diagram below. Notice that the similarities occur in elements which are diagonal to each other - not side-by-side. For example, boron is a non-metal with some properties rather like silicon.
Unlike the rest of Group 2, beryllium has some properties resembling aluminum. And lithium has some properties which differ from the other elements in Group 1, and in some ways resembles magnesium.
There is said to be a diagonal relationship between these elements. There are several reasons for this, but each depends on the way atomic properties like electronegativity vary around the Periodic Table. So we will have a quick look at this with regard to electronegativity - which is probably the simplest to explain.
Electronegativity increases across the Periodic Table. So, for example, the electronegativities of beryllium and boron are:. Electronegativity falls as you go down the Periodic Table.
So, for example, the electronegativities of boron and aluminum are:. So, comparing Be and Al, you find the values are by chance exactly the same.
The increase from Group 2 to Group 3 is offset by the fall as you go down Group 3 from boron to aluminum. Something similar happens from lithium 1. In these cases, the electronegativities are not exactly the same, but are very close. Similar electronegativities between the members of these diagonal pairs means that they are likely to form similar types of bonds, and that will affect their chemistry. You may well come across examples of this later on in your course.
Jim Clark Chemguide. What if two atoms of equal electronegativity bond together? If the atoms are equally electronegative, both have the same tendency to attract the bonding pair of electrons, and so it will be found on average half way between the two atoms: To get a bond like this, A and B would usually have to be the same atom. What if B is slightly more electronegative than A?
B will attract the electron pair rather more than A does. A "spectrum" of bonds The implication of all this is that there is no clear-cut division between covalent and ionic bonds.
0コメント